PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. base64_encode

Is urlencode() faster than base64_encode()

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0122 seconds, (1.459% faster)

urlencode() 100%
base64_encode() 98.541%

The urlencode() test took 0.8261 seconds.
The base64_encode() test took 0.8383 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 182,332 loops for a total of 3,646,630 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 182,332 loops.
  • Total difference 12.23 milliseconds for 3,646,630 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "base64_encode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = base64_encode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (