Test: urlencode vs. base64_encode
Is urlencode() faster than base64_encode()
Run this test again Return to test menuHistorical Results
Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0132 seconds, (1.431% faster)
The urlencode() test took 0.9062 seconds.
The base64_encode() test took 0.9193 seconds.
Nitty-Gritty
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 248,441 loops for a total of 4,968,812 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 248,441 loops.
- Total difference 13.15 milliseconds for 4,968,812 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
Code
The first test, "urlencode()", was:
$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);
The second test, "base64_encode()", was:
$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = base64_encode($GLOBALS['dummy']);