PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. base64_encode

Is urlencode() faster than base64_encode()

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0083 seconds, (1.079% faster)

urlencode() 100%
base64_encode() 98.921%

The urlencode() test took 0.7644 seconds.
The base64_encode() test took 0.7728 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 218,208 loops for a total of 4,364,167 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 218,208 loops.
  • Total difference 8.34 milliseconds for 4,364,167 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "base64_encode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = base64_encode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)