PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. base64_encode

Is urlencode() faster than base64_encode()

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "urlencode()" was the faster by 0.0067 seconds, (0.635% faster)

urlencode() 100%
base64_encode() 99.365%

The urlencode() test took 1.0445 seconds.
The base64_encode() test took 1.0512 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 294,130 loops for a total of 5,882,600 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.334) milliseconds per 294,130 loops.
  • Total difference 6.67 milliseconds for 5,882,600 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.2591) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.9958) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "base64_encode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = base64_encode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (