PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. base64_encode

Is urlencode() faster than base64_encode()

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "base64_encode()" was the faster by 0.001 seconds, (0.194% faster)

base64_encode() 100%
urlencode() 99.806%

The base64_encode() test took 0.5159 seconds.
The urlencode() test took 0.5169 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 146,910 loops for a total of 2,938,200 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000000) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.050) milliseconds per 146,910 loops.
  • Total difference 1.01 milliseconds for 2,938,200 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.9473) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.4732) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "base64_encode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = base64_encode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (