PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0095 seconds, (1.085% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 98.915%

The urlencode() test took 0.8642 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.8736 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 223,398 loops for a total of 4,467,960 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 223,398 loops.
  • Total difference 9.48 milliseconds for 4,467,960 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (