Historical ResultsBased on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "rawurlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0171 seconds, (1.869% faster)
The rawurlencode() test took 0.8951 seconds.
The urlencode() test took 0.9121 seconds.
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 212,427 loops for a total of 4,248,530 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 212,427 loops.
- Total difference 17.05 milliseconds for 4,248,530 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
The first test, "urlencode()", was:
$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);
The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:
$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);