PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0187 seconds, (2.013% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 97.987%

The urlencode() test took 0.9123 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.9311 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 188,070 loops for a total of 3,761,400 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 188,070 loops.
  • Total difference 18.74 milliseconds for 3,761,400 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)