PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "urlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0125 seconds, (1.618% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 98.382%

The urlencode() test took 0.7592 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.7716 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 199,818 loops for a total of 3,996,360 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 199,818 loops.
  • Total difference 12.48 milliseconds for 3,996,360 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)