PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "rawurlencode()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0171 seconds, (1.869% faster)

rawurlencode() 100%
urlencode() 98.131%

The rawurlencode() test took 0.8951 seconds.
The urlencode() test took 0.9121 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 212,427 loops for a total of 4,248,530 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 212,427 loops.
  • Total difference 17.05 milliseconds for 4,248,530 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)