PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "rawurlencode()" was the faster by 0.0248 seconds, (2.359% faster)

rawurlencode() 100%
urlencode() 97.641%

The rawurlencode() test took 1.0271 seconds.
The urlencode() test took 1.0519 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 285,521 loops for a total of 5,710,420 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.241) milliseconds per 285,521 loops.
  • Total difference 24.81 milliseconds for 5,710,420 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (3.4782) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.9352) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-8+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)