PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "urlencode()" was the faster by 0.0069 seconds, (0.855% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 99.145%

The urlencode() test took 0.7993 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.8062 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 120,517 loops for a total of 2,410,340 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.345) milliseconds per 120,517 loops.
  • Total difference 6.89 milliseconds for 2,410,340 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (9.0736) milliseconds and Code 2 was (7.1166) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)