PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "urlencode()" was the faster by 0.0247 seconds, (2.898% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 97.102%

The urlencode() test took 0.829 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.8537 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 158,022 loops for a total of 3,160,440 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.237) milliseconds per 158,022 loops.
  • Total difference 24.74 milliseconds for 3,160,440 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (7.0707) milliseconds and Code 2 was (7.8847) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (