PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "urlencode()" was the faster by 0.017 seconds, (2.028% faster)

urlencode() 100%
rawurlencode() 97.972%

The urlencode() test took 0.8192 seconds.
The rawurlencode() test took 0.8362 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 215,175 loops for a total of 4,303,500 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.848) milliseconds per 215,175 loops.
  • Total difference 16.95 milliseconds for 4,303,500 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.1903) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.9573) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (