PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: urlencode vs. rawurlencode

urlencode differs from RFC 1738 by encoding spaces as + instead of %20 as rawurlencode does

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "rawurlencode()" was the faster by 0.0245 seconds, (3.260% faster)

rawurlencode() 100%
urlencode() 96.74%

The rawurlencode() test took 0.7263 seconds.
The urlencode() test took 0.7507 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 133,173 loops for a total of 2,663,460 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.224) milliseconds per 133,173 loops.
  • Total difference 24.47 milliseconds for 2,663,460 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (5.1377) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.5823) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "urlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = urlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "rawurlencode()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = rawurlencode($GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)