PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: substr($var, 25, 1) vs. isset && {25}

Return the nth character of a string when the character does not exist.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "substr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0203 seconds, (1.961% faster)

substr() 100%
isset {5} 98.039%

The substr() test took 1.0167 seconds.
The isset {5} test took 1.037 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 264,586 loops for a total of 5,291,715 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 264,586 loops.
  • Total difference 20.33 milliseconds for 5,291,715 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "substr()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy'], 25, 1);

The second test, "isset {5}", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = isset($GLOBALS['dummy']{25}) ? $GLOBALS['dummy']{25} : '';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)