PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: substr($var, 25, 1) vs. isset && {25}

Return the nth character of a string when the character does not exist.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "substr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0056 seconds, (0.605% faster)

substr() 100%
isset {5} 99.395%

The substr() test took 0.9143 seconds.
The isset {5} test took 0.9199 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 214,980 loops for a total of 4,299,608 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 214,980 loops.
  • Total difference 5.57 milliseconds for 4,299,608 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "substr()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy'], 25, 1);

The second test, "isset {5}", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = isset($GLOBALS['dummy']{25}) ? $GLOBALS['dummy']{25} : '';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)