PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: substr($var, 25, 1) vs. isset && {25}

Return the nth character of a string when the character does not exist.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "substr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0094 seconds, (1.210% faster)

substr() 100%
isset {5} 98.79%

The substr() test took 0.7673 seconds.
The isset {5} test took 0.7767 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 199,461 loops for a total of 3,989,216 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 199,461 loops.
  • Total difference 9.40 milliseconds for 3,989,216 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "substr()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy'], 25, 1);

The second test, "isset {5}", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = isset($GLOBALS['dummy']{25}) ? $GLOBALS['dummy']{25} : '';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)