PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: substr on short vs. long strings

No Description

View test history (6) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "short" was the faster by 0.0041 seconds, (0.390% faster)

short 100%
long (x200) 99.61%

The short test took 1.0513 seconds.
The long (x200) test took 1.0554 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 272,445 loops for a total of 5,448,900 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.206) milliseconds per 272,445 loops.
  • Total difference 4.11 milliseconds for 5,448,900 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.2694) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.0616) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "short", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy_short'], 10, 10);

The second test, "long (x200)", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy_long'], 10, 10);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)