PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings

String replacement performance on a 37,500 character string.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (11) saved test runs, The test labeled "strtr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0123 seconds, (1.471% faster)

strtr() 100%
str_replace() 98.529%

The strtr() test took 0.8222 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 0.8344 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 214,177 loops for a total of 4,283,549 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 214,177 loops.
  • Total difference 12.27 milliseconds for 4,283,549 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strtr()", was:

strtr($GLOBALS['dummy'], array('string' => 'STRING!'));

The second test, "str_replace()", was:

str_replace('string', 'STRING!', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)