PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings

String replacement performance on a 37,500 character string.

View test history (19) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strtr()" was the faster by 0.0314 seconds, (5.629% faster)

strtr() 100%
str_replace() 94.371%

The strtr() test took 0.527 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 0.5584 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 133,778 loops for a total of 2,675,560 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000012) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.572) milliseconds per 133,778 loops.
  • Total difference 31.43 milliseconds for 2,675,560 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.7215) milliseconds and Code 2 was (3.0934) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strtr()", was:

strtr($GLOBALS['dummy'], array('string' => 'STRING!'));

The second test, "str_replace()", was:

str_replace('string', 'STRING!', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)