Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings

String replacement performance on a 37,500 character string.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "str_replace()" was the faster by 0.0293 seconds, (4.608% faster)

str_replace() 100%

strtr() 95.392%

The str_replace() test took 0.6061 seconds.
The strtr() test took 0.6354 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 169,621 loops for a total of 3,392,420 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
Avg difference (1.464) milliseconds per 169,621 loops.
Total difference 29.28 milliseconds for 3,392,420 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (3.8574) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.8980) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strtr()", was:

strtr($GLOBALS['dummy'], array('string' => 'STRING!'));

The second test, "str_replace()", was:

str_replace('string', 'STRING!', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

PHP Benchmarks