PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (short)

10 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location with both pass and fail paths.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (9) saved test runs, The test labeled "strncmp()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0065 seconds, (0.813% faster)

strncmp() 100%
strpos() 99.187%

The strncmp() test took 0.7913 seconds.
The strpos() test took 0.7978 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 203,572 loops for a total of 4,071,442 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 203,572 loops.
  • Total difference 6.49 milliseconds for 4,071,442 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)