PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (short)

10 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location with both pass and fail paths.

View test history (16) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strpos()" was the faster by 0.0522 seconds, (4.592% faster)

strpos() 100%
strncmp() 95.408%

The strpos() test took 1.0854 seconds.
The strncmp() test took 1.1377 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 275,714 loops for a total of 5,514,280 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (2.612) milliseconds per 275,714 loops.
  • Total difference 52.24 milliseconds for 5,514,280 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (5.4652) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.3883) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)