PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (short)

10 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location with both pass and fail paths.

View test history (17) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "strncmp()" was the faster by 0.0101 seconds, (1.832% faster)

strncmp() 100%
strpos() 98.168%

The strncmp() test took 0.54 seconds.
The strpos() test took 0.5501 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 122,461 loops for a total of 2,449,220 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.504) milliseconds per 122,461 loops.
  • Total difference 10.08 milliseconds for 2,449,220 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.8136) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.6938) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)