PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (long)

2000 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location, both pass and fail paths.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "strncmp()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0336 seconds, (3.080% faster)

strncmp() 100%
strpos() 96.92%

The strncmp() test took 1.056 seconds.
The strpos() test took 1.0896 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 289,325 loops for a total of 5,786,493 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000006) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 289,325 loops.
  • Total difference 33.55 milliseconds for 5,786,493 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)