PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (long)

2000 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location, both pass and fail paths.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "strncmp()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0475 seconds, (5.349% faster)

strncmp() 100%
strpos() 94.651%

The strncmp() test took 0.8397 seconds.
The strpos() test took 0.8872 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 186,703 loops for a total of 3,734,060 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000013) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 186,703 loops.
  • Total difference 47.45 milliseconds for 3,734,060 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)