Test: strncmp vs. strpos (long)

2000 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location, both pass and fail paths.

View test history (22) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strncmp()" was the faster by 0.0476 seconds, (2.447% faster)

strncmp() 100%

strpos() 97.553%

The strncmp() test took 1.8983 seconds.
The strpos() test took 1.946 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 269,730 loops for a total of 5,394,600 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
Avg difference (2.381) milliseconds per 269,730 loops.
Total difference 47.63 milliseconds for 5,394,600 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (49.5205) milliseconds and Code 2 was (57.8884) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

PHP Benchmarks