PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strncmp vs. strpos (long)

2000 character string, check if a substring exists in a defined location, both pass and fail paths.

View test history (5) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strncmp()" was the faster by 0.0118 seconds, (2.305% faster)

strncmp() 100%
strpos() 97.695%

The strncmp() test took 0.4987 seconds.
The strpos() test took 0.5105 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 129,694 loops for a total of 2,593,880 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.588) milliseconds per 129,694 loops.
  • Total difference 11.77 milliseconds for 2,593,880 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.9741) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.2384) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strncmp()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234', 5) === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strncmp($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234', 5) === 0;

The second test, "strpos()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_match'], '01234') === 0;
for ($j = 0; $j < 40; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], '01234') === 0;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)