PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "rand()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0041 seconds, (0.885% faster)

rand() 100%
mt_rand() 99.115%

The rand() test took 0.458 seconds.
The mt_rand() test took 0.4621 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 128,768 loops for a total of 2,575,360 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 128,768 loops.
  • Total difference 4.09 milliseconds for 2,575,360 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-8+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)