PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "mt_rand()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0169 seconds, (2.099% faster)

mt_rand() 100%
rand() 97.901%

The mt_rand() test took 0.7902 seconds.
The rand() test took 0.8072 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 193,211 loops for a total of 3,864,220 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 193,211 loops.
  • Total difference 16.94 milliseconds for 3,864,220 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (