PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "mt_rand()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0567 seconds, (5.905% faster)

mt_rand() 100%
rand() 94.095%

The mt_rand() test took 0.903 seconds.
The rand() test took 0.9597 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 197,232 loops for a total of 3,944,640 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000014) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 197,232 loops.
  • Total difference 56.67 milliseconds for 3,944,640 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)