PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "rand()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0086 seconds, (1.479% faster)

rand() 100%
mt_rand() 98.521%

The rand() test took 0.573 seconds.
The mt_rand() test took 0.5816 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 157,444 loops for a total of 3,148,870 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 157,444 loops.
  • Total difference 8.60 milliseconds for 3,148,870 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (