PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "rand()" was the faster by 0.0747 seconds, (6.300% faster)

rand() 100%
mt_rand() 93.7%

The rand() test took 1.1104 seconds.
The mt_rand() test took 1.185 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 285,326 loops for a total of 5,706,520 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000013) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (3.733) milliseconds per 285,326 loops.
  • Total difference 74.65 milliseconds for 5,706,520 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (6.2161) milliseconds and Code 2 was (8.2892) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (