PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: rand vs. mt_rand

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "mt_rand()" was the faster by 0.0148 seconds, (2.183% faster)

mt_rand() 100%
rand() 97.817%

The mt_rand() test took 0.6644 seconds.
The rand() test took 0.6792 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 146,666 loops for a total of 2,933,320 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.741) milliseconds per 146,666 loops.
  • Total difference 14.83 milliseconds for 2,933,320 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (6.6140) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.8257) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = rand(0, 1000);

The second test, "mt_rand()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = mt_rand(0, 1000);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (