PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: preg_replace vs. preg_replace_callback

Although preg_replace with 'e' is depreciated, this is left for historical reasons

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "preg_replace()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0377 seconds, (3.967% faster)

preg_replace() 100%
preg_replace_callback() 96.033%

The preg_replace() test took 0.9118 seconds.
The preg_replace_callback() test took 0.9494 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 235,480 loops for a total of 4,709,600 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 235,480 loops.
  • Total difference 37.67 milliseconds for 4,709,600 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "preg_replace()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~e', "strtolower('$1')", $GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "preg_replace_callback()", was:

/*
function cb($match)
{
	return strtolower($match[0]);
}
*/

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace_callback('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~', 'cb', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)