PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: preg_replace vs. preg_replace_callback

Although preg_replace with 'e' is depreciated, this is left for historical reasons

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "preg_replace()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0107 seconds, (1.374% faster)

preg_replace() 100%
preg_replace_callback() 98.626%

The preg_replace() test took 0.7656 seconds.
The preg_replace_callback() test took 0.7763 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 168,490 loops for a total of 3,369,792 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 168,490 loops.
  • Total difference 10.66 milliseconds for 3,369,792 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "preg_replace()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~e', "strtolower('$1')", $GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "preg_replace_callback()", was:

/*
function cb($match)
{
	return strtolower($match[0]);
}
*/

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace_callback('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~', 'cb', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)