PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: preg_replace vs. preg_replace_callback

Although preg_replace with 'e' is depreciated, this is left for historical reasons

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "preg_replace()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0014 seconds, (0.189% faster)

preg_replace() 100%
preg_replace_callback() 99.811%

The preg_replace() test took 0.7418 seconds.
The preg_replace_callback() test took 0.7432 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 197,131 loops for a total of 3,942,628 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000000) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 197,131 loops.
  • Total difference 1.40 milliseconds for 3,942,628 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "preg_replace()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~e', "strtolower('$1')", $GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "preg_replace_callback()", was:

/*
function cb($match)
{
	return strtolower($match[0]);
}
*/

$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = preg_replace_callback('~([Ww]heat|[Tt]hins)~', 'cb', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)