Test: preg_match vs. strpos (complex)

No Description

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "strpos()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0059 seconds, (1.086% faster)

strpos() 100%

preg_match() 98.914%

The strpos() test took 0.5398 seconds.
The preg_match() test took 0.5457 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 134,629 loops for a total of 2,692,580 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 134,629 loops.
Total difference 5.93 milliseconds for 2,692,580 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "preg_match()", was:

if (preg_match('~http://([^\./]+\.[^/]+?)/~', $GLOBALS['dummy'], $match) != 0)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $match[1];

The second test, "strpos()", was:

$pos_start = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy'], 'http://') + strlen('http://');
$pos_slash = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy'], '/', $pos_start + 2);

$pos_dot = strpos($GLOBALS['dummy'], '.', $pos_start + 1);
if ($pos_dot !== null && $pos_dot < $pos_slash)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = substr($GLOBALS['dummy'], $pos_start, $pos_slash - $pos_start);

PHP Benchmarks