PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: ob_start/ob_get_contents vs. concat

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "ob_start()" was the faster by 0.0312 seconds, (4.786% faster)

ob_start() 100%
concat 95.214%

The ob_start() test took 0.6215 seconds.
The concat test took 0.6527 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 158,845 loops for a total of 3,176,900 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000010) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.562) milliseconds per 158,845 loops.
  • Total difference 31.24 milliseconds for 3,176,900 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.4215) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.5702) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "ob_start()", was:

ob_start();

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	echo 'Wheat Thins!';

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();

The second test, "concat", was:

$value = '';
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$value .= 'Wheat Thins!';

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $value;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)