PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: ob_start/ob_get_contents vs. concat

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "ob_start()" was the faster by 0.0166 seconds, (3.084% faster)

ob_start() 100%
concat 96.916%

The ob_start() test took 0.5204 seconds.
The concat test took 0.5369 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 137,113 loops for a total of 2,742,260 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000006) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.828) milliseconds per 137,113 loops.
  • Total difference 16.56 milliseconds for 2,742,260 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.0543) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.3238) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "ob_start()", was:

ob_start();

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	echo 'Wheat Thins!';

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();

The second test, "concat", was:

$value = '';
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$value .= 'Wheat Thins!';

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $value;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)