PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: abs vs. ternary

Does calling abs() take any less or more time than doing it manually?

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (8) saved test runs, The test labeled "abs()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0096 seconds, (1.314% faster)

abs() 100%
ternary 98.686%

The abs() test took 0.7247 seconds.
The ternary test took 0.7343 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 163,236 loops for a total of 3,264,723 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 163,236 loops.
  • Total difference 9.65 milliseconds for 3,264,723 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "abs()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = abs($GLOBALS['dummy']);

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = -83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = abs($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "ternary", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] ? -$GLOBALS['dummy'] : $GLOBALS['dummy'];

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = -83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] ? -$GLOBALS['dummy'] : $GLOBALS['dummy'];

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)