PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: abs vs. ternary

Does calling abs() take any less or more time than doing it manually?

View test history (11) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "abs()" was the faster by 0.0063 seconds, (1.099% faster)

abs() 100%
ternary 98.901%

The abs() test took 0.5664 seconds.
The ternary test took 0.5727 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 137,800 loops for a total of 2,756,000 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.315) milliseconds per 137,800 loops.
  • Total difference 6.29 milliseconds for 2,756,000 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.3973) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.4544) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "abs()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = abs($GLOBALS['dummy']);

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = -83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = abs($GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "ternary", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] ? -$GLOBALS['dummy'] : $GLOBALS['dummy'];

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = -83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 50; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] ? -$GLOBALS['dummy'] : $GLOBALS['dummy'];

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)