PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: min/max vs. if

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "ifs" was the faster by 0.0067 seconds, (0.600% faster)

ifs 100%
min()/max() 99.4%

The ifs test took 1.1108 seconds.
The min()/max() test took 1.1175 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 297,415 loops for a total of 5,948,300 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.335) milliseconds per 297,415 loops.
  • Total difference 6.71 milliseconds for 5,948,300 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (4.0728) milliseconds and Code 2 was (3.1529) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "min()/max()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = min(50, max(20, $GLOBALS['dummy']));

The second test, "ifs", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 83;
for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] < 20)
		$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = 20;
	elseif ($GLOBALS['dummy'] > 50)
		$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = 50;
	else
		$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'];
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-18+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)