PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "strtr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0278 seconds, (3.689% faster)

strtr() 100%
str_replace() 96.311%

The strtr() test took 0.7256 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 0.7534 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 181,336 loops for a total of 3,626,720 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 181,336 loops.
  • Total difference 27.79 milliseconds for 3,626,720 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strtr()", was:

$GLOBALS['i']++;

The second test, "str_replace()", was:

$GLOBALS['asdfasdfasdfjjskljdfklajlsdjfajskldfjkaskjdkfjaskldjfklasjkldfjklasdj']++;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)