PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings

No Description

View test history (4) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strtr()" was the faster by 0.0572 seconds, (4.080% faster)

strtr() 100%
str_replace() 95.92%

The strtr() test took 1.3444 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 1.4016 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 282,444 loops for a total of 5,648,880 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000010) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (2.860) milliseconds per 282,444 loops.
  • Total difference 57.19 milliseconds for 5,648,880 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (15.7548) milliseconds and Code 2 was (15.5949) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "strtr()", was:

$GLOBALS['i']++;

The second test, "str_replace()", was:

$GLOBALS['asdfasdfasdfjjskljdfklajlsdjfajskldfjkaskjdkfjaskldjfklasjkldfjklasdj']++;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)