Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings
No Description
View test history (3) Run this test again Return to test menuResult: Discarded
The test labeled "strtr()" was the faster by 0.0351 seconds, (3.418% faster)
The strtr() test took 0.9905 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 1.0256 seconds.
Nitty-Gritty
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 190,153 loops for a total of 3,803,060 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (1.753) milliseconds per 190,153 loops.
- Total difference 35.06 milliseconds for 3,803,060 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (8.4471) milliseconds and Code 2 was (7.6055) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
Code
The first test, "strtr()", was:
$GLOBALS['i']++;
The second test, "str_replace()", was:
$GLOBALS['asdfasdfasdfjjskljdfklajlsdjfajskldfjkaskjdkfjaskldjfklasjkldfjklasdj']++;