Test: strtr vs. str_replace on long strings
No Description
View test history (3) Run this test again Return to test menuResult: Discarded
The test labeled "strtr()" was the faster by 0.0907 seconds, (13.742% faster)
The strtr() test took 0.5692 seconds.
The str_replace() test took 0.6599 seconds.
Nitty-Gritty
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 129,453 loops for a total of 2,589,060 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000035) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (4.534) milliseconds per 129,453 loops.
- Total difference 90.68 milliseconds for 2,589,060 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.6835) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.8491) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
Code
The first test, "strtr()", was:
$GLOBALS['i']++;
The second test, "str_replace()", was:
$GLOBALS['asdfasdfasdfjjskljdfklajlsdjfajskldfjkaskjdkfjaskldjfklasjkldfjklasdj']++;