PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include_once vs. function_exists

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "function_exists()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0036 seconds, (0.436% faster)

function_exists() 100%
include_once 99.564%

The function_exists() test took 0.8326 seconds.
The include_once test took 0.8362 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 206,388 loops for a total of 4,127,750 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 206,388 loops.
  • Total difference 3.65 milliseconds for 4,127,750 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();

include_once('supplement/func1.inc');

The second test, "function_exists()", was:

clearstatcache();

if (!function_exists('f2'))
	include('supplement/func2.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)