PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include_once vs. function_exists

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "function_exists()" was the faster by 0.0552 seconds, (7.065% faster)

function_exists() 100%
include_once 92.935%

The function_exists() test took 0.7261 seconds.
The include_once test took 0.7813 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 149,157 loops for a total of 2,983,140 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000019) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (2.760) milliseconds per 149,157 loops.
  • Total difference 55.20 milliseconds for 2,983,140 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (7.6631) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.4671) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();

include_once('supplement/func1.inc');

The second test, "function_exists()", was:

clearstatcache();

if (!function_exists('f2'))
	include('supplement/func2.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)