PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. include_once

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.018 seconds, (2.795% faster)

include 100%
include_once 97.205%

The include test took 0.6245 seconds.
The include_once test took 0.6425 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 130,606 loops for a total of 2,612,120 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 130,606 loops.
  • Total difference 17.96 milliseconds for 2,612,120 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();
include_once('supplement/dummy.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)