PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. include_once

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0136 seconds, (1.562% faster)

include 100%
include_once 98.438%

The include test took 0.8601 seconds.
The include_once test took 0.8737 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 190,978 loops for a total of 3,819,560 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 190,978 loops.
  • Total difference 13.65 milliseconds for 3,819,560 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();
include_once('supplement/dummy.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)