PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. include_once

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "include_once" was the faster by 0.0143 seconds, (1.224% faster)

include_once 100%
include 98.776%

The include_once test took 1.1509 seconds.
The include test took 1.1652 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 277,263 loops for a total of 5,545,260 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.713) milliseconds per 277,263 loops.
  • Total difference 14.27 milliseconds for 5,545,260 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (6.9241) milliseconds and Code 2 was (5.8460) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();
include_once('supplement/dummy.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)