PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. include_once

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "include_once" was the faster by 0.0035 seconds, (0.682% faster)

include_once 100%
include 99.318%

The include_once test took 0.5091 seconds.
The include test took 0.5126 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 131,482 loops for a total of 2,629,640 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.175) milliseconds per 131,482 loops.
  • Total difference 3.50 milliseconds for 2,629,640 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.0470) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.2323) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();
include_once('supplement/dummy.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)