PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. include_once

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "include_once" was the faster by 0.1158 seconds, (14.977% faster)

include_once 100%
include 85.023%

The include_once test took 0.6571 seconds.
The include test took 0.7729 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 147,194 loops for a total of 2,943,880 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000039) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (5.788) milliseconds per 147,194 loops.
  • Total difference 115.76 milliseconds for 2,943,880 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (11.2538) milliseconds and Code 2 was (6.9089) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "include_once", was:

clearstatcache();
include_once('supplement/dummy.inc');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)