Historical ResultsBased on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0153 seconds, (1.464% faster)
The include test took 1.0325 seconds.
The eval() test took 1.0478 seconds.
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 296,364 loops for a total of 5,927,280 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 296,364 loops.
- Total difference 15.34 milliseconds for 5,927,280 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
The first test, "include", was:
The second test, "eval()", was:
clearstatcache(); eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));