PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "eval()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0643 seconds, (4.465% faster)

eval() 100%
include 95.535%

The eval() test took 1.376 seconds.
The include test took 1.4403 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 274,316 loops for a total of 5,486,320 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000012) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 274,316 loops.
  • Total difference 64.31 milliseconds for 5,486,320 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)