PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0339 seconds, (3.641% faster)

include 100%
eval() 96.359%

The include test took 0.8962 seconds.
The eval() test took 0.9301 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 217,067 loops for a total of 4,341,337 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 217,067 loops.
  • Total difference 33.86 milliseconds for 4,341,337 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)