PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0119 seconds, (1.472% faster)

include 100%
eval() 98.528%

The include test took 0.7978 seconds.
The eval() test took 0.8097 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 180,505 loops for a total of 3,610,092 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 180,505 loops.
  • Total difference 11.92 milliseconds for 3,610,092 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)