PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "eval()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0236 seconds, (2.848% faster)

eval() 100%
include 97.152%

The eval() test took 0.8041 seconds.
The include test took 0.8277 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 185,179 loops for a total of 3,703,587 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000006) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 185,179 loops.
  • Total difference 23.57 milliseconds for 3,703,587 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "include", was:


The second test, "eval()", was:

eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (