PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0153 seconds, (1.464% faster)

include 100%
eval() 98.536%

The include test took 1.0325 seconds.
The eval() test took 1.0478 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 296,364 loops for a total of 5,927,280 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 296,364 loops.
  • Total difference 15.34 milliseconds for 5,927,280 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-18+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)