PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "include" was (on average) the faster by 0.0169 seconds, (1.971% faster)

include 100%
eval() 98.029%

The include test took 0.8394 seconds.
The eval() test took 0.8563 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 221,169 loops for a total of 4,423,370 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 221,169 loops.
  • Total difference 16.87 milliseconds for 4,423,370 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)