PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "eval()" was the faster by 0.0192 seconds, (1.650% faster)

eval() 100%
include 98.35%

The eval() test took 1.1422 seconds.
The include test took 1.1614 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 266,686 loops for a total of 5,333,720 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.958) milliseconds per 266,686 loops.
  • Total difference 19.17 milliseconds for 5,333,720 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (12.4195) milliseconds and Code 2 was (6.3837) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)