PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "eval()" was the faster by 0.0643 seconds, (4.465% faster)

eval() 100%
include 95.535%

The eval() test took 1.376 seconds.
The include test took 1.4403 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 274,316 loops for a total of 5,486,320 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000012) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (3.216) milliseconds per 274,316 loops.
  • Total difference 64.31 milliseconds for 5,486,320 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (17.0186) milliseconds and Code 2 was (17.0647) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "include", was:


The second test, "eval()", was:

eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (