PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: include vs. eval

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "eval()" was the faster by 0.0326 seconds, (2.821% faster)

eval() 100%
include 97.179%

The eval() test took 1.1245 seconds.
The include test took 1.1571 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 277,492 loops for a total of 5,549,840 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000006) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.632) milliseconds per 277,492 loops.
  • Total difference 32.65 milliseconds for 5,549,840 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (7.2907) milliseconds and Code 2 was (3.0943) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "include", was:

clearstatcache();
include('supplement/dummy.inc');

The second test, "eval()", was:

clearstatcache();
eval('?' . '>' . file_get_contents('supplement/dummy.inc'));

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)