PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: callback vs. wrapped

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "wrapped" was (on average) the faster by 0.0119 seconds, (1.372% faster)

wrapped 100%
callback 98.628%

The wrapped test took 0.8556 seconds.
The callback test took 0.8675 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 195,428 loops for a total of 3,908,568 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 195,428 loops.
  • Total difference 11.90 milliseconds for 3,908,568 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "callback", was:

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] === 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
$cb();

The second test, "wrapped", was:

/*
function do_something($type)
{
	if ($type === 'do_something1')
		do_something1();
	else
		do_something2();
}
*/

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] == 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
do_something($cb);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)