PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: callback vs. wrapped

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "wrapped" was (on average) the faster by 0.0038 seconds, (0.575% faster)

wrapped 100%
callback 99.425%

The wrapped test took 0.6487 seconds.
The callback test took 0.6525 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 155,690 loops for a total of 3,113,800 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 155,690 loops.
  • Total difference 3.75 milliseconds for 3,113,800 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "callback", was:

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] === 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
$cb();

The second test, "wrapped", was:

/*
function do_something($type)
{
	if ($type === 'do_something1')
		do_something1();
	else
		do_something2();
}
*/

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] == 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
do_something($cb);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)