PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: callback vs. wrapped

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "wrapped" was (on average) the faster by 0.0087 seconds, (0.938% faster)

wrapped 100%
callback 99.062%

The wrapped test took 0.9159 seconds.
The callback test took 0.9246 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 233,931 loops for a total of 4,678,610 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 233,931 loops.
  • Total difference 8.67 milliseconds for 4,678,610 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "callback", was:

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] === 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
$cb();

The second test, "wrapped", was:

/*
function do_something($type)
{
	if ($type === 'do_something1')
		do_something1();
	else
		do_something2();
}
*/

if ($GLOBALS['dummy'] == 41)
	$cb = 'do_something1';
else
	$cb = 'do_something2';
do_something($cb);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)