PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: callback vs. call_user_func

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "callback" was (on average) the faster by 0.0083 seconds, (1.075% faster)

callback 100%
call_user_func() 98.925%

The callback test took 0.759 seconds.
The call_user_func() test took 0.7672 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 190,108 loops for a total of 3,802,160 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 190,108 loops.
  • Total difference 8.25 milliseconds for 3,802,160 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "callback", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

$cb = 'do_something';
$cb(74);

The second test, "call_user_func()", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

$cb = 'do_something';
call_user_func($cb, 74);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)