PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: callback vs. call_user_func

No Description

View test history (4) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "callback" was the faster by 0.0081 seconds, (0.767% faster)

callback 100%
call_user_func() 99.233%

The callback test took 1.0484 seconds.
The call_user_func() test took 1.0565 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 282,825 loops for a total of 5,656,500 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.405) milliseconds per 282,825 loops.
  • Total difference 8.10 milliseconds for 5,656,500 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (4.8296) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.1089) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "callback", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

$cb = 'do_something';
$cb(74);

The second test, "call_user_func()", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

$cb = 'do_something';
call_user_func($cb, 74);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)