PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: fcall vs. callback

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "fcall" was (on average) the faster by 0.0039 seconds, (0.351% faster)

fcall 100%
callback 99.649%

The fcall test took 1.0984 seconds.
The callback test took 1.1023 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 297,152 loops for a total of 5,943,040 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 297,152 loops.
  • Total difference 3.87 milliseconds for 5,943,040 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "fcall", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

do_something(74);

The second test, "callback", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
$GLOBALS['do_something_cb'] = 'do_something';
*/

$GLOBALS['do_something_cb'](74);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-18+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)