PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: fcall vs. callback

No Description

View test history (4) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "fcall" was the faster by 0.0262 seconds, (3.714% faster)

fcall 100%
callback 96.286%

The fcall test took 0.6785 seconds.
The callback test took 0.7046 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 164,064 loops for a total of 3,281,280 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.308) milliseconds per 164,064 loops.
  • Total difference 26.17 milliseconds for 3,281,280 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.2635) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.8756) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "fcall", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

do_something(74);

The second test, "callback", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
$GLOBALS['do_something_cb'] = 'do_something';
*/

$GLOBALS['do_something_cb'](74);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)