PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: fcall vs. call_user_func

No Description

View test history (3) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "fcall" was the faster by 0.0395 seconds, (3.901% faster)

fcall 100%
call_user_func() 96.099%

The fcall test took 0.9736 seconds.
The call_user_func() test took 1.0131 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 252,023 loops for a total of 5,040,460 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.976) milliseconds per 252,023 loops.
  • Total difference 39.52 milliseconds for 5,040,460 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (4.5767) milliseconds and Code 2 was (5.3131) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "fcall", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

do_something(74);

The second test, "call_user_func()", was:

/*
function do_something($i)
{
	for ($i = 0; $i < 20; $i++)
		$GLOBALS['dummy'] + $i;
}
*/

call_user_func('do_something', 74);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)