PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: foreach (fcall) vs. foreach ($temp)

Is the array being iterated cached? It could cause some nasty side effects to OOP if it is, but maybe PHP is smart about this.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "foreach (fcall)" was (on average) the faster by 0.001 seconds, (0.125% faster)

foreach (fcall) 100%
foreach ($temp) 99.875%

The foreach (fcall) test took 0.8203 seconds.
The foreach ($temp) test took 0.8213 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 198,125 loops for a total of 3,962,490 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000000) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 198,125 loops.
  • Total difference 1.03 milliseconds for 3,962,490 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "foreach (fcall)", was:

foreach (array_merge(range(1, 10), range(11, 20), range(21, 30), range(31, 40)) as $v)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $v;

The second test, "foreach ($temp)", was:

$temp = array_merge(range(1, 10), range(11, 20), range(21, 30), range(31, 40));
foreach ($temp as $v)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $v;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)