PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: foreach/range vs. for

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (9) saved test runs, The test labeled "foreach" was (on average) the faster by 0.0152 seconds, (1.712% faster)

foreach 100%
for 98.288%

The foreach test took 0.8706 seconds.
The for test took 0.8858 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 231,418 loops for a total of 4,628,351 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 231,418 loops.
  • Total difference 15.16 milliseconds for 4,628,351 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "foreach", was:

$range = range(0, 100);
foreach ($range as $n)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $n;

The second test, "for", was:

for ($n = 0; $n <= 100; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $n;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)