PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: foreach/range vs. for

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "foreach" was (on average) the faster by 0.0098 seconds, (1.000% faster)

foreach 100%
for 99%

The foreach test took 0.9745 seconds.
The for test took 0.9843 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 253,523 loops for a total of 5,070,464 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 253,523 loops.
  • Total difference 9.84 milliseconds for 5,070,464 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "foreach", was:

$range = range(0, 100);
foreach ($range as $n)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $n;

The second test, "for", was:

for ($n = 0; $n <= 100; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = $n;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)