PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: foreach vs. for

Note that this isn't helpful unless you have ascending int keys.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (7) saved test runs, The test labeled "foreach" was (on average) the faster by 0.0078 seconds, (0.976% faster)

foreach 100%
for 99.024%

The foreach test took 0.7954 seconds.
The for test took 0.8032 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 198,375 loops for a total of 3,967,497 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 198,375 loops.
  • Total difference 7.84 milliseconds for 3,967,497 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "foreach", was:

foreach ($GLOBALS['dummy'] as $v)
	$v[0] + 1;

The second test, "for", was:

for ($k = 0, $n = count($GLOBALS['dummy']); $k < $n; $k++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'][$k][0] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (