PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: foreach vs. for

Note that this isn't helpful unless you have ascending int keys.

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "foreach" was (on average) the faster by 0.0193 seconds, (1.751% faster)

foreach 100%
for 98.249%

The foreach test took 1.0833 seconds.
The for test took 1.1026 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 277,768 loops for a total of 5,555,360 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 277,768 loops.
  • Total difference 19.31 milliseconds for 5,555,360 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "foreach", was:

foreach ($GLOBALS['dummy'] as $v)
	$v[0] + 1;

The second test, "for", was:

for ($k = 0, $n = count($GLOBALS['dummy']); $k < $n; $k++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'][$k][0] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (