PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: === null vs. == null

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "== null" was the faster by 0.0001 seconds, (0.020% faster)

== null 100%
=== null 99.98%

The == null test took 0.4723 seconds.
The === null test took 0.4724 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 125,587 loops for a total of 2,511,740 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000000) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.005) milliseconds per 125,587 loops.
  • Total difference 0.10 milliseconds for 2,511,740 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.7711) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.6251) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "=== null", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] = $GLOBALS['dummy1'] === null;
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] += $GLOBALS['dummy2'] === null;
}

The second test, "== null", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] = $GLOBALS['dummy1'] == null;
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] += $GLOBALS['dummy2'] == null;
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)