PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: === null vs. is_null

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "=== null" was (on average) the faster by 0.0058 seconds, (0.742% faster)

=== null 100%
is_null() 99.258%

The === null test took 0.7815 seconds.
The is_null() test took 0.7873 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 189,175 loops for a total of 3,783,500 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 189,175 loops.
  • Total difference 5.84 milliseconds for 3,783,500 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "=== null", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] = $GLOBALS['dummy1'] === null;
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] += $GLOBALS['dummy2'] === null;
}

The second test, "is_null()", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] = is_null($GLOBALS['dummy1']);
	$GLOBALS['dummy3'] += is_null($GLOBALS['dummy2']);
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)