PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: commas vs. sprintf on long strings

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (5) saved test runs, The test labeled "sprintf()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0059 seconds, (0.823% faster)

sprintf() 100%
commas 99.177%

The sprintf() test took 0.7137 seconds.
The commas test took 0.7196 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 179,312 loops for a total of 3,586,248 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 179,312 loops.
  • Total difference 5.92 milliseconds for 3,586,248 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "commas", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "sprintf()", was:

echo sprintf('%s test %s%s test ', $GLOBALS['x'], $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)