PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: commas vs. sprintf on long strings

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "sprintf()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0089 seconds, (1.160% faster)

sprintf() 100%
commas 98.84%

The sprintf() test took 0.7547 seconds.
The commas test took 0.7636 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 203,426 loops for a total of 4,068,510 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 203,426 loops.
  • Total difference 8.86 milliseconds for 4,068,510 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "commas", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "sprintf()", was:

echo sprintf('%s test %s%s test ', $GLOBALS['x'], $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)