PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: commas vs. sprintf on long strings

No Description

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "commas" was the faster by 0.0053 seconds, (0.950% faster)

commas 100%
sprintf() 99.05%

The commas test took 0.5553 seconds.
The sprintf() test took 0.5606 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 133,683 loops for a total of 2,673,660 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.266) milliseconds per 133,683 loops.
  • Total difference 5.32 milliseconds for 2,673,660 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.5711) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.5197) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "commas", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "sprintf()", was:

echo sprintf('%s test %s%s test ', $GLOBALS['x'], $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)