PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (dynamic)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "echo" was (on average) the faster by 0.0371 seconds, (3.849% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 96.151%

The echo test took 0.9271 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.9642 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 210,337 loops for a total of 4,206,745 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 210,337 loops.
  • Total difference 37.11 milliseconds for 4,206,745 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "echo", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x']; ?> test <?php echo $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'];?> test <?php

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (