PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (dynamic)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (7) saved test runs, The test labeled "echo" was (on average) the faster by 0.012 seconds, (1.426% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 98.574%

The echo test took 0.8316 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.8436 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 222,605 loops for a total of 4,452,103 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 222,605 loops.
  • Total difference 12.03 milliseconds for 4,452,103 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "echo", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x']; ?> test <?php echo $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'];?> test <?php

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (