PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (dynamic)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "echo" was (on average) the faster by 0.0197 seconds, (3.845% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 96.155%

The echo test took 0.4935 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.5133 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 133,567 loops for a total of 2,671,340 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 133,567 loops.
  • Total difference 19.74 milliseconds for 2,671,340 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x']; ?> test <?php echo $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'];?> test <?php

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)