PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (dynamic)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (10) saved test runs, The test labeled "echo" was (on average) the faster by 0.009 seconds, (1.199% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 98.801%

The echo test took 0.7435 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.7526 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 197,609 loops for a total of 3,952,186 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 197,609 loops.
  • Total difference 9.02 milliseconds for 3,952,186 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x']; ?> test <?php echo $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'];?> test <?php

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)