PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (dynamic)

No Description

View test history (9) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "echo" was the faster by 0.0135 seconds, (2.165% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 97.835%

The echo test took 0.6088 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.6222 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 142,590 loops for a total of 2,851,800 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.674) milliseconds per 142,590 loops.
  • Total difference 13.47 milliseconds for 2,851,800 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.5700) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.9502) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x']; ?> test <?php echo $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'];?> test <?php

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)