PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (static)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "echo" was (on average) the faster by 0.0288 seconds, (3.546% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 96.454%

The echo test took 0.7833 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.8121 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 150,755 loops for a total of 3,015,090 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000010) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 150,755 loops.
  • Total difference 28.80 milliseconds for 3,015,090 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	echo 'some text';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	?>some text<?php
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)