PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (static)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "<?php ?>" was the faster by 0.0021 seconds, (0.190% faster)

<?php ?> 100%
echo 99.81%

The <?php ?> test took 1.0893 seconds.
The echo test took 1.0914 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 250,481 loops for a total of 5,009,620 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000000) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.104) milliseconds per 250,481 loops.
  • Total difference 2.07 milliseconds for 5,009,620 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (3.8162) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.6687) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	echo 'some text';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	?>some text<?php
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)