PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (static)

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "echo" was the faster by 0.0245 seconds, (2.602% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 97.398%

The echo test took 0.9172 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 0.9417 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 230,013 loops for a total of 4,600,260 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.225) milliseconds per 230,013 loops.
  • Total difference 24.50 milliseconds for 4,600,260 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.0320) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.7179) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	echo 'some text';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	?>some text<?php
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)