PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: echo vs. ?>...<?php (static)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "echo" was the faster by 0.0723 seconds, (6.751% faster)

echo 100%
<?php ?> 93.249%

The echo test took 0.999 seconds.
The <?php ?> test took 1.0714 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 287,724 loops for a total of 5,754,480 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000013) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (3.617) milliseconds per 287,724 loops.
  • Total difference 72.33 milliseconds for 5,754,480 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.4195) milliseconds and Code 2 was (4.5392) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "echo", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
	echo 'some text';

The second test, "<?php ?>", was:

for ($j = 0; $j < 100; $j++)
{
	?>some text<?php
}

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-8+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)