PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: commas vs. concat on long strings

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "commas" was (on average) the faster by 0.0044 seconds, (0.438% faster)

commas 100%
concat 99.562%

The commas test took 1.0009 seconds.
The concat test took 1.0053 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 221,887 loops for a total of 4,437,737 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 221,887 loops.
  • Total difference 4.40 milliseconds for 4,437,737 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "commas", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "concat", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'] . ' test ' . $GLOBALS['y'] . $GLOBALS['z'] . ' test ';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)