PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: commas vs. concat on long strings

No Description

View test history (6) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "commas" was the faster by 0.0266 seconds, (2.425% faster)

commas 100%
concat 97.575%

The commas test took 1.0699 seconds.
The concat test took 1.0965 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 253,547 loops for a total of 5,070,940 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.330) milliseconds per 253,547 loops.
  • Total difference 26.59 milliseconds for 5,070,940 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.8210) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.9744) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "commas", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'], ' test ', $GLOBALS['y'], $GLOBALS['z'], ' test ';

The second test, "concat", was:

echo $GLOBALS['x'] . ' test ' . $GLOBALS['y'] . $GLOBALS['z'] . ' test ';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)