PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. microtime(true)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0107 seconds, (1.045% faster)

time() 100%
microtime(true) 98.955%

The time() test took 1.0115 seconds.
The microtime(true) test took 1.0222 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 283,446 loops for a total of 5,668,920 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 283,446 loops.
  • Total difference 10.68 milliseconds for 5,668,920 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "microtime(true)", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = microtime(true);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (