PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. microtime(true)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "microtime(true)" was (on average) the faster by 0.0058 seconds, (0.624% faster)

microtime(true) 100%
time() 99.376%

The microtime(true) test took 0.9264 seconds.
The time() test took 0.9322 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 236,964 loops for a total of 4,739,285 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 236,964 loops.
  • Total difference 5.81 milliseconds for 4,739,285 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "microtime(true)", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = microtime(true);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (