PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. microtime(true)

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0707 seconds, (5.888% faster)

time() 100%
microtime(true) 94.112%

The time() test took 1.1306 seconds.
The microtime(true) test took 1.2014 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 289,611 loops for a total of 5,792,220 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000012) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 289,611 loops.
  • Total difference 70.73 milliseconds for 5,792,220 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "microtime(true)", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = microtime(true);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (