PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (13) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0106 seconds, (1.319% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 98.681%

The time() test took 0.7928 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.8034 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 203,058 loops for a total of 4,061,168 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000003) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 203,058 loops.
  • Total difference 10.60 milliseconds for 4,061,168 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (