PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0069 seconds, (1.057% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 98.943%

The time() test took 0.6478 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.6547 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 175,440 loops for a total of 3,508,805 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 175,440 loops.
  • Total difference 6.92 milliseconds for 3,508,805 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-18+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)