PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (33) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0095 seconds, (1.188% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 98.812%

The time() test took 0.7941 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.8037 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 206,325 loops for a total of 4,126,493 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 206,325 loops.
  • Total difference 9.55 milliseconds for 4,126,493 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (