PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (18) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0201 seconds, (2.539% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 97.461%

The time() test took 0.77 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.79 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 190,928 loops for a total of 3,818,554 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 190,928 loops.
  • Total difference 20.06 milliseconds for 3,818,554 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.19-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)