PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0252 seconds, (2.854% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 97.146%

The time() test took 0.8568 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.882 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 207,620 loops for a total of 4,152,403 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000006) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 207,620 loops.
  • Total difference 25.17 milliseconds for 4,152,403 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)