PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (12) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0081 seconds, (0.937% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 99.063%

The time() test took 0.8514 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.8594 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 196,345 loops for a total of 3,926,892 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 196,345 loops.
  • Total difference 8.06 milliseconds for 3,926,892 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)