PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (6) saved test runs, The test labeled "time()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0052 seconds, (0.829% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 99.171%

The time() test took 0.6234 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.6286 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 142,960 loops for a total of 2,859,200 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 142,960 loops.
  • Total difference 5.21 milliseconds for 2,859,200 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)