PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: time vs. strtotime('now')

No Description

View test history (33) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "time()" was the faster by 0.0368 seconds, (6.291% faster)

time() 100%
strtotime('now') 93.709%

The time() test took 0.5475 seconds.
The strtotime('now') test took 0.5842 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 135,507 loops for a total of 2,710,140 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000014) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.838) milliseconds per 135,507 loops.
  • Total difference 36.76 milliseconds for 2,710,140 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.8551) milliseconds and Code 2 was (3.0873) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "time()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = time();

The second test, "strtotime('now')", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strtotime('now');

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)